ISO 14443-3 PDF

Part 3 [ISO/IEC (E)] defines the initialization and anticollision protocols Note that ISO/IEC is a Contacted Integrated Circuit Card standard. INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition. Identification ISO’s member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright . The ISO/IEC describes how to select (“activate”) a single card. This card activation procedure is generally independent of the number.

Author: Kazinos Kazigis
Country: Mexico
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 1 January 2009
Pages: 488
PDF File Size: 17.38 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.83 Mb
ISBN: 494-4-97045-877-5
Downloads: 2776
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Basida

This problem existed in the version of the standard and was corrected in Amendment 1 in by adding the clause: Obviously, no hash is free of collisions, as long as the hash is shorter than the hashed data — but the probability of something randomly changing the hashed data to false data with the same hash is so small, it can be neglected in practice.

There are usually some patterns like one vendor has some prefix and then prefix of card type – So it looks to me more like somebody had bad day than calculated trough decision. Practical standards do practical implications. Maybe in an effort to phase out type A?

ISO/IEC 14443

Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies. Sign up using Facebook.

Post as a guest Name. I found a nice answer to my question here: By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

  CULTIVARE PLEUROTUS PDF

NTAG – ISO – part 4 | NXP Community

But nevertheless it is not correct and the general director of the company I am working for will definitely come to look at what we are doing with two such cards in his wallet. Sign up using Facebook. Some limitations quickly occurred: By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Post as a guest Name.

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. This answer talks about competing technologies brought forward by two different companies: I’ve been recently rewriting ISO anti-collision loop and kso out that it is actually not correctly defined in the standard.

Cryptography depends on an attacker not, by sheer luck, finding the right key on the first try; jso engineering is all “oh all these iron atoms are aranged in a neat metal grid, so the probability of a crystal fracture going through the whole steel beam supporting this skyscraper is really really small”.

Sign up using Email and Password. At the time, type A couldn’t power up a microprocessor continuously. I don’t like that you can easily fabricate this one – and it is not defined what to do in that case.

ISO anti-collision protocol is not correct Ask Question. Email Required, but never shown. So somebody will come and will start to poke into readers to see if it not breaks something.

  APM9435 DATASHEET PDF

nfc – ISO anti-collision protocol is not correct – Stack Overflow

Am I right or did I miss something? I don’t fully understand it. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.

Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject 14443–3 these policies. This problem existed in the version of the standard and was corrected in Amendment 1 in by adding the clause:.

Or even detect that it happend. Email Required, but never shown. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. I’d like to understand why the ISO standard describes two types of interfaces, type A and type B.

This separation is not relevant anymore since you can have type A or type B memory or microprocessor cards, and we ended up with two competing technologies in the same standard. Can I find more details somewhere?

NTAG 216 – ISO 14443 – part 4

Look at hash functions, for example. I do agree, this is a bad thing tm to be in a standard. The Innovatron company had working microprocessor cards, so their technology was integrated as type B in the standard.