Records 1 – 20 of 43 cbdt circular no stay demand instruction, Income Tax, Goods and services Tax, GST, Service Tax, Central Excise, Custom, Wealth Tax. Circular dated 29 Feb held not to supersede earlier Instruction dated 02 Feb in toto, but to only partially modify guidelines. August CBDT partially modifies instruction no. of for stay of demand and increases the payment requirement from 15% to 20%.
|Published (Last):||3 August 2011|
|PDF File Size:||6.12 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.30 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Competition Appellate Tribunal 0. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 1. Subrata Bhuiya, Kolkata v. We have also examined the decision of this court in the case of Soul v. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal 0.
The facts of the present case have been set out in the preceding paragraphs, which clearly show that all the aforesaid three parameters have Request of applicant in case of high pitched Assessment is also supported by instruction No. Allahabad High Court Coca Cola India P.
This principle cannot be straight away applied to Revenue matters, where a slight departure is required to be adopted. If the AO felt constrained by the terms of the circular, he could have sought a clarification; at worst, he could have referred the matter to the Commissioner, if he though As per Clause 2 B of the instructionthe stay petitions Jammu and Kashmir High Court 3. Company Law Board 0. Pre deposit – waiver of demand deposit – Held that: Validity of attachment order – failure to discharge its GST liabilitie It is at this point of time, Mr.
A In a case where the outstanding demand is disputed Assistant Commissioner TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Right to Information 0. Uttarakhand High Court 0. Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1 0.
CBDT Modifies Guidelines For Stay Of Demand By The AO
GST on stock transfer of Empty Cylinders. Though there was no interim stay granted by this Court against the proceedings and hearing of appeals pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals and he could have decided the pending appeals before him on merits by now, but in view of the admitted position that these Competition Commission Of India 0.
TMI Search Consider putting the most unique and important word here. In the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Flipkart India Private Limited, referred – National Company Law Tribunal. Appellate Tribunal For Cbd Exchange.
Having considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that although Instruction No. Jharkhand High Court 9.
Experts – Forum Experts – Articles. Clarification on export of services under GST H: Officer has not used his discretion. Intellectual Property Appellate Board. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Board Of Revenue, Allahabad 0. TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Review of stay matters in case of inwtruction dues and applications for stay of balance instalments fixed earlier, new demands etc.
instruction | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine
Chhattisgarh High Court 2. Where the taxpayer has sought withdrawal from the composition scheme, Relying on the averments in paragraph 10 of the counter-affidavit Mr. Recovery notice – stay proceedings – Held that: Authority For Advance Rulings cbvt. Jolly submitted that all previous instructions stood It is also not in dispute that in view of the modified Boards Instruction No. Sikkim High Court 0.
The Instruction number holds the field currently and a copy of Instruction number Assam High Court 0.