BBMP hits on new idea to enforce building byelaws. November 26, IST. Updated: April 29, IST. Share Article; PRINT; A A A. November. Appeal No/ before the Karnataka Appellate. Tribunal (‘KAT’ for . Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Bye-laws is the one. HD 33 SFB , BANGALORE, DATED: Director General, Fire and Emergency Services and Commissioner BBMP. Miestas building bye laws/ Zonal regulations, national Building Code as well as under other provision.
|Published (Last):||13 September 2016|
|PDF File Size:||15.13 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.25 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1 0. Himachal Pradesh High Court 2.
In the first half of alone, fire cases were reported in Bengaluru BBMP limits, says a top Karnataka fire department official. To make the proposal viable, the palike should have a database of property in its limits, which it is attempting to create using the Geographic Information System GIS. It shall not sanction the plans contrary to the building bye – laws Sikkim High Court 0.
Subramanya told buiilding press conference earlier in the day. You have reach your max limit. Fire safety norms for city high-rises. The OPs are engaged in running the st business of building and developing housing schemes. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission 0. Filter Filter through years using slider. Authority For Advance Rulings 0.
New fire safety norms for city high rises
This Court, by consent of learned Advocates appearing No Case or Topic can be added. Competition Commission Of India 0. Many buildings used to get OC without any certifications too. Dhaka High Court 0. Himachal Pradesh High Court. Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction 0. Go ask any building manager about the goals of the electrical inspectorate.
Chhattisgarh High Court 0. Kerala High Court 3.
New fire safety norms for city high rises – Citizen Matters, Bengaluru
The OPs advertised about their The Corporation should act in aid of the building bye – laws. Intellectual Property Appellate Board.
Tripura High Court 0. Gauhati High Court 1. What provisions are in place that this does not become another area where people have to shell our bribes? Central Electricity Regulatory Commission. Madhya Pradesh High Court.
Central Administrative Tribunal 1. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal 0. He brings to my notice, the provisions contained in the said Section, which reads as follows: Manipur High Court 0.
From To 0. Jharkhand High Court 1. Akrama Sakrama is not a long term solution to the problems in real estate sector.
Those penalised will have to cough up double the property tax, Dr. The learned counsel for the complainants contended that the building plan was sanctioned on About Navya P K Articles.
Andhra Pradesh High Court 9. Can’t display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.
BBMP hits on new idea to enforce building byelaws
Board Of Revenue, Uttarakhand 0. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 0.
Grounds on which approval of site for The Government, in its amendment to the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act to bring about the Sakrama scheme, has not laid out a course of action for city corporations and town municipal councils if a violator does not seek the benefits of the regularisation scheme.
It is therefore contended that the approval of such plan for construction is contrary to the Building Bye – lawsof the first The assessment official from these points has to keep an eye out for any building activity, violations, inspect the roads and drains in his jurisdiction. Madhya Pradesh High Court 1.
The Commissioner of be Corporation of the City of Bangalore is directed Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 8. Paws Das 10 SCC Cyber Appellate Tribunal 0. Please log in or register for a free trial to access these features.