The Archko Volume. By John Baskette, AIA Research Associate. Hi folks! I’ve just finished a book called _The Archko Volume_ Anyone else have any. The Archko volume; or, The archeological writings of the Sanhedrim and Talmuds of the Jews. (Intra secus.) These are the official documents made in these. W. D. Mahan published a book entitled The Archko Volume. It is the results of his search for 1st century documents. Rev Mahan wrote that his research took him.
|Published (Last):||25 December 2004|
|PDF File Size:||14.23 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.68 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
They always apply current events of the day to fulfilled prophecy decade after decade. In short, he voulmes he obtained the copy through the help of a German scholar, Henry C.
Could some of the letters be real? Goodspeed could not tell where this Boston document originated from.
The Archko volume is on the loose again! Everyone under the table!
I have read Tony Breeden and his inspired, for lack of a better word—discernments. Taken from the ancient parchments and scrolls at Constantinople and the Vatican at Vilumes Mahan published a book entitled The Vvolumes Volume.
My point is not to nitpick, but to point out that, even if we lump it with orthodox apocrypha, there are errors in the Archko Volume. Regarding the interpretation of scripture. Everybody has a right to their own opinion, right? Goodspeed is wrong; as is the case with many over educated Theology Professors who as an example view the Bible stories as just stories; they ignore archeology, and haven’t an inkling of what a “type” is.
One need only to pick up a copy of the New York Times to see what errors await future historians using it as a resource. Mahan continued; Justin says, in Vol. In defense of Rev Mahan, he himself wrote: I heard about it while watching brother Kent Hovind, on his creation science.
I hate to be redundant, but how many times does a fellow have to tell you?
I would love to read the letters to the Laodiceans or the first two letters that Paul wrote that he mentions in the Corinthian letters. Besides, in order to make your endorsement of the Archko Volume over the Bible, you have to set yourself as an authority on religion, thus making a mockery of your original statement. Apparently Christ Himself would not be Christ-like enough for you are comparing me to a stained-glass Christ of your own imagination rather than the Christ of the Bible.
Mahan might not have been very educated. Some of us want to teach the Word of God to people and there are those who want only to rape their wallets. Caiaphas then summoned Peter and John whom he questioned at length and was fully convinced that the man whose execution he had ordered had truly been resurrected and was living. This is not out of the realm of biological possibility [compare with odd abilities such as the electric eel and the bombadier beetle].
Can its testimonies inside be confirmed by any source other than itself or various copies or differnet language versions of itself? Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here This page was last edited on 6 Mayat If the source [account] rachko from a credible source, I would happily mention it to my congregation as a nonCanonical source that verifies the Scriptural accounts.
Pilates conclude his letter by saying: In his defense, how could he have known how popular the novel would become? Other such contradictions abound.
And since Archko relates a near-conversion of a vooumes and misunderstood Pontius Pilate; why not convert Herod as well? So today Archkko finally decided to investigate its authenticity Archko volume. Mahan could have traveled and researched all these documents in only about 2 months. March 4, at On page 28 he says that Jesus was the son of Mary; that he was the founder of the sect called Christians.
II, page 42, that the several Roman governors in their respective provinces made reports of the important events that occurred in their jurisdiction, and they were spread on the senatorial dockets in Rome. Goodspeed also said no record exists of the “so-called” Vatican librarian, Archio Freelinhusen, whom Reverend Mahan claimed to have conversed with in Rome.
The Reverend does not seem to be immune to the lure of money. Chad Reeves ChadReeves3 says: Your comments regarding original works and original thinking are misguided.
The fates of Tyre, Ninevah, Babylon, Ashkelon and many other cities have been accurately forecast by Biblical prophets. I have no problem believing what he states in his book could be true, any more than I have no problem believing his book could be a fraud. Notify me of new posts via email. xrchko
A Critique of the Archko Library – Defending Genesis
Needless to say, the Vatican does not admit to having any book of this kind nor archhko there any record in the annals of the Vatican library of any such person as Father Peter Freelinhusen. Some of it seemed authentic while some of it sounded felonious. Believing things fast, until I was ashamed and learned to investigate things throughly. Goodspeed, Modern Apocrypha Boston: Vantberger of New York, for English translation.
Quite the contrary; I suppose we can know the volumrs with certainty and that it will set us free.